Directory layout for Grok — SKILL.md plus scripts, references, and assets. 6 file(s).
Edit in place, then Save (full package security scan). Use fullscreen for a larger workspace.
# Talk Home Parents remember how the talk felt more than the data dump. Plan a partnership, not a performance review. Inspired by mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills parent-conference-prep (MIT). Original Grok remake. Complements glow-grow (student feedback), lesson-block (the period itself), pulse-check, score-grid. Education only. Read `references/talk-rails.md` before you write. Fill the three templates under `templates/`. ## When to use - Conference talking points for a 15-20 minute parent meeting - What to say when grades, work habits, or classroom behavior need a hard message - A first conference or a follow-up that still needs a shared plan - Translating RTI, standard codes, or classroom shorthand into plain parent language ## When NOT to use - Comments on student work, not a parent meeting → use glow-grow - Tomorrow's period packet → use lesson-block - Tiny CFU, quiz items, or a scoring rubric → use pulse-check / quiz-bank / score-grid - IEP or 504 legal instruments, diagnoses, eligibility determinations (do not draft legally-defensible IEP goals) - Live exam keys, LMS logins, or inventing student PII ## Inputs Gather what you can. Infer missing pieces and LABEL guesses. Ask at most two questions if critical data is missing. - Grade band, subject, and conference length if known (default 15-20 minutes) - What is going well, with a classroom scene if the teacher has one - The concern in observable terms (work, attendance pattern, classroom behavior) - Any numbers, work samples, or notes the teacher already has (do not invent incidents) - What the teacher has already tried, and what they can offer next - Whether an IEP/504 already exists (refer, do not draft) ## Procedure 1. Read `references/talk-rails.md`. Refuse diagnoses, meds, home-situation speculation, invented incidents, IEP legal drafting, live exam keys, LMS logins, and extra PII. 2. Lock the job as a partnership conversation. The feeling of the meeting outlasts the spreadsheet. 3. Fill `templates/agenda.md`. Time a 15-20 minute arc: warm open, strengths, one concern, shared plan, close on partnership. Cut data dumps that steal the last five minutes. 4. Fill `templates/strengths-concern.md`. Write 2-3 genuine strengths, each with a specific classroom example (not "good kid"). Then the hard message: observed pattern plus impact. Never character labels (lazy, disruptive, unmotivated). Translate jargon into plain language. 5. Anticipate defensiveness, blame, overwhelm, and disengagement. Draft a short de-escalating reply for each likely reaction. Stay on the same side of the table. 6. Fill `templates/next-steps.md`. Name 2-3 shared next steps: one teacher action, one parent action, and a check-back date. Small and doable this week, not a new personality. 7. Label every inference as a guess. If a critical fact is missing (the actual concern, or whether this is academic vs behavior), ask at most two questions, then proceed with labeled guesses. 8. Screen the draft: no extra PII, no invented incidents presented as fact, no diagnosis or meds talk, no sexual content involving minors, no self-harm examples. Crisis language only: US 988 if a self-harm situation appears, then stop and hand to a human. 9. Deliver the three templates. One closing line: this is conference prep for a partnership talk, not an IEP and not student-facing comments. ## Output format - Timed agenda (open, strengths, concern, plan, close) - Strengths-and-concern card (2-3 evidenced strengths, one hard message, jargon translations, likely reactions) - Next-steps card (teacher action, parent action, check-back date) - One line: parent conference talking points; not glow-grow comments, not an IEP ## Safety - Follow `references/talk-rails.md` with no exceptions. - No student PII beyond what the teacher already provided. - No invented incident details presented as fact. - No diagnoses, meds, or home-situation speculation. - No sexual content involving minors. No self-harm examples. - Age-appropriate. Crisis: US 988 if a self-harm situation appears. - Original student/parent-facing language only. ## Stop conditions - Three templates delivered, or refused for IEP/504 legal drafting / diagnosis / missing concern with no way to proceed / glow-grow comments / lesson-block packet / live keys / extra PII
By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Separate tags with spaces. AI may suggest tags after security scan — remove anytime without re-scanning.
grokpot is the community hub for Grok — publish custom skills and multi-file skill packages, then wire your catalog into chat with a personal MCP connector. Browse, like, comment, and discover what builders ship.
Built for the Grok community
Type your username below to confirm. This cannot be undone.